Comments on: APIdock about to roll out… with Ruby and RSpec! http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/ on Rails Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:01:37 +0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Marcos Wright Kuhns http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-7666 Marcos Wright Kuhns Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:37:50 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-7666 Another big thanks for this great project! Since you said you'll add Ruby 1.9 if there's interest, I wanted to publicly express interest. Even adding Ruby 1.8.7 could be helpful. Keep up the good work! Another big thanks for this great project! Since you said you’ll add Ruby 1.9 if there’s interest, I wanted to publicly express interest. Even adding Ruby 1.8.7 could be helpful. Keep up the good work!

]]> By: Daniel Lucraft http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-4523 Daniel Lucraft Wed, 10 Sep 2008 09:05:08 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-4523 This is great thanks! Can we have the rspec-rails docs as well please? Thats where all the ".should redirect_to(..)" and ".should have_tag(..)" stuff is defined. This is great thanks! Can we have the rspec-rails docs as well please? Thats where all the “.should redirect_to(..)” and “.should have_tag(..)” stuff is defined.

]]> By: Jonno http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-394 Jonno Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:51:22 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-394 Hi, I work on multiple versions of ruby on different projects. I used to search rails 2.0.2 with this url (firefox location bar keyword search): http://rails-doc.org/rails/v2.0.2/search?query=%s I now get an error (including if I sub rails-doc.org for apidock.com) Can you please enable some form for GET url for searching multiple version for rails. Thanks Hi,

I work on multiple versions of ruby on different projects. I used to search rails 2.0.2 with this url (firefox location bar keyword search):

http://rails-doc.org/rails/v2.0.2/search?query=%s

I now get an error (including if I sub rails-doc.org for apidock.com)

Can you please enable some form for GET url for searching multiple version for rails.

Thanks

]]> By: Marcio http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-383 Marcio Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:27:48 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-383 We want merb! MERB ! MERB ! MERB ! MERB ! :) Congratulations guys. APIDock *really* rocks. We want merb!
MERB ! MERB ! MERB ! MERB !
:)

Congratulations guys. APIDock *really* rocks.

]]> By: nachokb http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-380 nachokb Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:43:15 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-380 Impressive release. Now it rocks any other doc tool ever written. As I am a spoiled brat (my last comment begged for multi project / multi version support :D), I'm gonna beg again: * Could we have the categories in the "Related Methods" columns made collapsible (usually I want to look at instance methods, and they are far down). * The versions bar graph is great, but I'd love to have a mean to see what changed since the last version (I know a full diff viewer is not trivial but we could make with another collapsible panel like "Show Source" with a messy detail of the changes or something like that). * #nav_search { position: fixed; } :D This last one I'm already hacking around, but other may like it too. The first one could also be hackable (although I'm a jQuery guy, would need a little research to pull it off). Thanks for this wonderful contribution. P.S. When Rails started, one of the things which were criticized was its documentation. Over the last month I worked in a project using Java + Hibernate + Tapestry5 (IoC + web), and can tell you, Ruby and Rails documentation, blogs and forums (and now API Dock) certainly beat the hell out of anything they can offer... particularly in terms of integration (alright, officially T5 is not released yet but it has been extremely stable for more than a year). nachokb Impressive release. Now it rocks any other doc tool ever written.

As I am a spoiled brat (my last comment begged for multi project / multi version support :D), I’m gonna beg again:

* Could we have the categories in the “Related Methods” columns made collapsible (usually I want to look at instance methods, and they are far down).
* The versions bar graph is great, but I’d love to have a mean to see what changed since the last version (I know a full diff viewer is not trivial but we could make with another collapsible panel like “Show Source” with a messy detail of the changes or something like that).
* #nav_search { position: fixed; } :D

This last one I’m already hacking around, but other may like it too. The first one could also be hackable (although I’m a jQuery guy, would need a little research to pull it off).

Thanks for this wonderful contribution.

P.S. When Rails started, one of the things which were criticized was its documentation. Over the last month I worked in a project using Java + Hibernate + Tapestry5 (IoC + web), and can tell you, Ruby and Rails documentation, blogs and forums (and now API Dock) certainly beat the hell out of anything they can offer… particularly in terms of integration (alright, officially T5 is not released yet but it has been extremely stable for more than a year).

nachokb

]]> By: Chuong Huynh http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-332 Chuong Huynh Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:52:21 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-332 I have a few observations: - Some special methods, such as Array#-, Array#* are not accessible. I think it's due to url escape. Please check. - Can we distinguish deprecated (should not be used) from deleted (not available anymore in new version) items? I have a few observations:

- Some special methods, such as Array#-, Array#* are not accessible. I think it’s due to url escape. Please check.

- Can we distinguish deprecated (should not be used) from deleted (not available anymore in new version) items?

]]> By: Eeko http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-320 Eeko Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:38:27 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-320 (Accidentally posted this comment into another post in the archive before) Nice. Could you still make rails-doc.org reference to apidock.com/rails, as it would be a bit smoother to be able to make searches straight from the main page? (Accidentally posted this comment into another post in the archive before)

Nice. Could you still make rails-doc.org reference to apidock.com/rails, as it would be a bit smoother to be able to make searches straight from the main page?

]]> By: anonymouse http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-318 anonymouse Fri, 15 Aug 2008 05:17:58 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-318 rails-doc.org should redirect to apidock.com/rails instead of apidock.com rails-doc.org should redirect to apidock.com/rails instead of apidock.com

]]> By: Oleg http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-317 Oleg Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:27:54 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-317 Enjoying your application quite a bit. I have a request though. Put back the big honking search field you used to have, please! I hate using the small one on the side. Enjoying your application quite a bit. I have a request though. Put back the big honking search field you used to have, please! I hate using the small one on the side.

]]> By: Olly http://blog.nodeta.fi/2008/08/14/apidock-about-to-roll-out-with-ruby-and-rspec/comment-page-1/#comment-316 Olly Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:36:18 +0000 http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=55#comment-316 Just to say, great new release - I'm really liking the multiple projects. Although I would like to be able to: - Search all the project at once (although this might be too much overhead) - Have spaces converted to underscores when searching - so 'has many' == 'has_many' - Search the list using a quicksilver-esque algorithm (http://orderedlist.com/articles/live-search-with-quicksilver-style-for-jquery). So 'habtm' matches 'has_and_belongs_to_many' But otherwise the site is great. Just to say, great new release – I’m really liking the multiple projects.

Although I would like to be able to:
– Search all the project at once (although this might be too much overhead)
– Have spaces converted to underscores when searching – so ‘has many’ == ‘has_many’
– Search the list using a quicksilver-esque algorithm (http://orderedlist.com/articles/live-search-with-quicksilver-style-for-jquery). So ‘habtm’ matches ‘has_and_belongs_to_many’

But otherwise the site is great.

]]>