<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: APIdock 1.1 deployed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.flowdock.com/2008/11/04/apidock-11-deployed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.flowdock.com/2008/11/04/apidock-11-deployed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:52:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran</title>
		<link>http://blog.flowdock.com/2008/11/04/apidock-11-deployed/comment-page-1/#comment-7745</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 01:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=68#comment-7745</guid>
		<description>Hey. Great to see the site is still active but the problem with ? in the method names still exists.

Check out http://apidock.com/rails/Object/instance_variable_defined%3F

The page title says instance_variable_defined?, and the related methods are correct, but the heading shows between?, the package shows ruby (not rails), and the description is about javascript (not between?). Thats 3 bugs in one url!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey. Great to see the site is still active but the problem with ? in the method names still exists.</p>
<p>Check out <a href="http://apidock.com/rails/Object/instance_variable_defined%3F" rel="nofollow">http://apidock.com/rails/Object/instance_variable_defined%3F</a></p>
<p>The page title says instance_variable_defined?, and the related methods are correct, but the heading shows between?, the package shows ruby (not rails), and the description is about javascript (not between?). Thats 3 bugs in one url!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chess</title>
		<link>http://blog.flowdock.com/2008/11/04/apidock-11-deployed/comment-page-1/#comment-7740</link>
		<dc:creator>Chess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=68#comment-7740</guid>
		<description>When I bring up empty? in Rails on ActiveRecordAssociations it places me on the template_exists? method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I bring up empty? in Rails on ActiveRecordAssociations it places me on the template_exists? method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nacho Caballero</title>
		<link>http://blog.flowdock.com/2008/11/04/apidock-11-deployed/comment-page-1/#comment-7674</link>
		<dc:creator>Nacho Caballero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nodeta.fi/?p=68#comment-7674</guid>
		<description>Hey guys, 
I love APIdock, it&#039;s an awesome site. Today I found a bug and I didn&#039;t see an easy way to report it so I&#039;m telling you here because it might be related to the new release.
Searching for the &quot;equal?&quot; method in the Ruby documentation displays &quot;template_exists?&quot; instead. You should look into it.

Thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,<br />
I love APIdock, it&#8217;s an awesome site. Today I found a bug and I didn&#8217;t see an easy way to report it so I&#8217;m telling you here because it might be related to the new release.<br />
Searching for the &#8220;equal?&#8221; method in the Ruby documentation displays &#8220;template_exists?&#8221; instead. You should look into it.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

